A private long-term care insurance policy precisely covers the difference between the benefit amount provided by the statutory long-term care insurance and the actual costs incurred. Three models have become established on the market, differing in terms of payout logic, flexibility, and premium stability.
Long-term care daily allowance insurance
This insurance provides a contractually agreed daily or monthly payment in the event of needing care, the amount of which is tiered according to the level of care required. The use of the money remains unrestricted. This is the most flexible option, as it can also finance care provided by family members or a professional caregiver. I recommend paying attention to the tiered benefit structure in the lower care levels, any automatic adjustments to compensate for rising costs, and whether the insurer offers a premium waiver in the event of a claim.
Long-term care insurance
Reimbursement of documented costs is typically provided as a percentage of the remaining costs after the long-term care insurance fund has made its initial payment. The advantage lies in the close link to actual expenses. However, a disadvantage is that benefits for care provided by family members are often limited, and documentation is still required.
Long-term care insurance
It provides a lifelong pension in the event of needing long-term care and combines this coverage with a savings component. While premiums are higher, they are more stable in terms of calculations, and a portion of the capital is preserved. For individuals with existing assets who wish to avoid premium adjustments in old age, this represents a serious option.
In addition, there is the government-subsidized long-term care insurance (Pflege-Bahr). Those who contribute at least ten euros per month receive a five-euro supplement per month, amounting to 60 euros annually. The advantage lies in the waiver of a health check, making it attractive for individuals with pre-existing conditions. However, the disadvantages should be noted: a waiting period of up to five years and a level of benefits that, on its own, does not close the coverage gap. It can be useful as a supplement or combined policy, but rarely as the sole source of coverage.
For tax purposes, contributions to supplemental long-term care insurance are considered other precautionary expenses. In practice, however, this deduction often proves ineffective for employees, as the maximum amount is already exhausted by contributions to mandatory health and long-term care insurance. I therefore advise against factoring in the tax advantage as a fixed expense.
The premium is primarily determined by the age at which the policy is taken out. Calculations by the rating agency Assekurata show that a 25-year-old can fully insure herself against nursing home care costs of around €2,000 per month for approximately €38 per month. Those who only take out a policy at age 60 pay significantly more, assuming they even pass the health assessment. This is precisely where many prospective policyholders misunderstand: long-term care insurance is not just for retirees, but a decision for those in middle working life.